Following the comments of that other website:
"Let it be known" for this modest blog about the comments of the person signing as Sotrondio therefore say that is a false message as they come, about the honest conduct of the Coordinating Ecolóxica of Asturies and Frutti, or fib about slander that support the Energy Strategy 2007-2012, when the opposite is true, then not support it as envisioned, and makes it very clear that there are people who strongly supports the creatures of the Energy Strategy in Asturias, SPAIN and that will not stop slanders and calumnies up where they are, so to eat the soup kitchen and provided staff to deceive.
It would be strange if it were some areca champion, who raises such fabrications.
Sorry to hear certain things.
Tell Arthur that does not discourage people saying that the European Ombudsman is useless, because you are very wrong in your assertion.
And another thing, I go to the courts of justice have cost a lot money to creditworthy individuals and political parties, although it is true that the associations are entitled to legal aid can make complaints without paying the costs and so on Courts of Justice, until the European Court if hciera lack, well, they do ACA and other groups if they can, but you forget Arthur sometimes do have to pay some costs, especially if it is lost in the trial, under what circumstances, although the associations if they lose a lawsuit they are often charged, that does not mean that a judge may in some cases and collect some money ciucunstancias, that we do Júzcar convenient, though not usually do.
That would explain a jurist better here would not hurt.
Discourage people to not bring before the Ombudsman is to ignore what does work sometimes, but you can not say siemprre, but often works as well as works sometimes complain to Human Rights Commission UN, ask Mario Conde, who did so and because of that could go before reaching full term full 20 years in Spanish prisons, unable to leave much earlier because the arguments in his complaint to the Commission on Human UN Human.
"The Energy Strategy of Asturias horionte 2012", reasons that can claim to the Spanish court, before the Human Rights Commission of the UN and the European Ombudsman:
Point 1 - The file you have to ask the present Government of the Principality of Asturias 2007-2012 energy strategy is changing continuously, so you have to ask, is the record prior to this date, December 2009, and subsequent updates by the constant revisions or amendments made to the project, strategy or initial plan, and you should order the case to the Asturian Government, which closes in band to not deliver the file of the "Energy Strategy to 2012 horizon Asturias "which will have their reasons, but the Asturian government and the central government of Spain, are in flagrant violation of the Law on Access to Information:" Law 27/2006 of 18 July, BY REGULATING ACCESS RIGHTS LA
INFORMATION, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS (transposing the Directives 2003/4/EC and 2003/35/EC):
Point 2 - The Energy Strategy 2007-2012 is not something that affects only the Energy section would affect paragraphs: Air, Space, Implementation legal regulations, Planning, and Miscellaneous. A total of 7 points. Would be 4 sections (Canteras, Forestry, Livestock and Water) can also be related, especially if you make further modifications to the initial Asturias Energy Strategy.
Point 3 - Another argument is the urgency to address an issue that involves the development of infrastructure so dangerous and so many with two long years of illegal adoption by the Governing Council of the Principality of Asturias.
For if any group or person is not aware of the issue, and very briefly, the Energy Strategy of Asturias was passed behind the general public and without participation, without which organizations such as SHARE, and CREAM BED say anything and was made without discussion, with parliamentary approval in the Board of the Principality of Asturias, which is virtually the only autonomous region that has become so undemocratic approval, bypassing any state and European legislation.
2 years ago there was but an agreement of the Governing Council that could not be used, as an administrative act was not strong enough to challenge the Energy Strategy of Asturias horizon to 2012, and now it can be used , patently, is the official authorization for the installation of the gas plant in the port of Bahia and Musel of Gijon (Asturias) for the resolution of 29-XII-2008 from the Directorate General for Energy Policy and Mines laying Permission project management "Regasification Terminal Liquefied Natural Gas in the Port of El Musel", municipality of Gijón.
The known complete file, which apparently are still changing and replacement shall, or should include, sies that have not changed so far, all the projects in question, ie what mentioned about technical projects or plans (which are or must be a single regional plan or comprehensive regional File) related, at least for the most part, the contents of the hierarchical recourse IN CONNECTION WITH THE SETTLEMENT OF 29/12/2008 * Directorate General for Energy Policy and Mines, laying gives ENAGAS SA administrative approval for construction of a recpeción plant, LNG storage and regasification at the port of Gijon Musel. It is suggested the resolution also read BOPA OF PUBLISHED ON 2/2/09.
Some examples of state regulations that bypasses the Asturian government and Spain:
Exhibiting here an excerpt from the * argument forwarded by some of the groups, which was rejected by the Ministry of Environment of Spain and set under appeal Regasificadora Non Platform, its link:
There were a few minor political parties that made their respective arguments ( "Green Party and Humanist-PEH"
and "Los Verdes de Asturias").
Arguments also sent some civic associations, as ACA (Association of Collective Asturian), your link:
* Excerpt from one of the arguments forwarded by some of the groups:
On 4 November 2008, the General Meeting held some hearings of the Principality of "experts" cited by the political groups in the House, following a parliamentary initiative to discuss the so-called "Energy Strategy of Asturias on the horizon 2012, "a document approved by the Government Council of the Principality of Asturias on 11 April 2007, which was not submitted to the parliamentary groups until July 2008, at which time it was agreed that information such hearings, in which, by first time, the Asturian society was informed that the document was publicly administratively, by recognizing the Minister of Industry, Graciano Torre, when asked by the opposition, which had actually been approved, although he refused to recognize the exact time * (minutes of hearings held in JGPA, which we refer to these arguments) link:
In those same hearings on 4 November 2008, Mr. d. Isaac Pola Alonso, CEO of Energy, acknowledged, as contained in those minutes of the session, and referring to the document apparently approved by the Governing Council of the Principality of Asturias: "... we had previously discussed an issue procedural issues relating to environmental impact assessment. He had said that the competition for energy planning of activities covered by the transmission of electricity and gas is recognized as the state competition in the electricity sector laws and the law of the Hydrocarbon Sector. Such planning corresponds to the State, to request a proposal from different players, different partners, who are mainly traders and autonomous regions, operators of the electricity grid and gas network and the autonomous communities. As I said, the proposals of the Community of the Principality of Asturias were happily almost entirely reflected in national planning documents "...
That the approval of the Energy Strategy by the Governing Council, which as we've managed to learn that occurred on 11 April 2007, and was not publicized other than by a small press release was picked up in just a few lines newspaper in its online edition.
That has not been published in any official means of dissemination of management agreements.
That was not previously discussed at the General Meeting of the Principality, and it is not until June 2008 when it began processing at the General Meeting, when the document published in the Bulletin Board, became known publicly by a small circle composed of people interested in environmental issues, although today has not been disseminated to the general public or a vote of the Asturian Parliament's political groups.
That despite the foregoing, the document itself was incorporated into the National Plan which was adopted by the Council of Ministers of 30 May 2008, as acknowledged in his hearing the CEO of Energy.
That at no time has there been a chance for citizens to know or rely on all these issues, and not only that, but when in June of 2008 we found out what was happening, we found that we could not attend the justice to the seriousness of the facts with which we are, because at that time there were no administrative acts that appeal, and the policy of fait accompli that is being practiced, we encounter when we go to court, the destruction will be Indeed, so we understand that there are all an attempt by the government to present the consequences of that plan as a whole and irreversible fait accompli, with very serious injury to public interest and the democratic right to participation enshrined in the Spanish Constitution, clearly violating the spirit and letter of laws and international conventions on the subject.
Have also been raped regional competencies in environmental and planning, deliberately, as the Government of the Principality itself has missed the usual consultations with bodies such as the quota, the BED and cream.
Given the apparent breach of the obligations in this area is the Government of the Principality, which has openly violated the commitments acquired by Spain known as the Aarhus Convention on 25 July 1998, ratified by HM The King on 15 December 2004, and ignores the legal force of its transposition into Spanish law by Law 27/2006 of 18 July, which regulates the rights of access to information, public participation and access to justice in environmental matters, we headed to the Ministry with a double request:
1) To intervene in the urgently with the Government of Asturias to remind their obligations in this matter, under commitments made by the Kingdom of Spain to the Economic Commission for Europe United Nations and also under the obligations established by the Spanish legal order itself, to cease its attitude of ignoring the citizens and not again fall into default size.
2) That the National Assessment Report which is at present undergoing a process of public participation in the filing that the claims should be filed to have this allegation and stating the blatant failure by the Government of the Principality of Asturias, by which these groups announced their intention to contest the National Energy Plan in the courts of law, the competent European bodies before the Commission and Economic Commission for Europe, beginning with the violation of fundamental rights of citizens recognized by the Spanish Constitution, as well as other laws and regulations that are being blatantly trampled in Asturias at the moment, in such sensitive. ]
The file you have to ask the present Government of the Principality of Asturias 2007-2012 energy strategy is changing continuously, so you have to ask, is not only the record preceding this date, December 2009, but the current and any subsequent updates of the Energy Strategy 2007-2012, due to constant revisions and changes that are made or made to the project, or comprehensive regional strategy oo original plan.
Everyone, collectives and individuals should ask the Government Asturian, record, or records of the "Energy Strategy of Asturias horizon 2012" was closed because no band to deliver that by law and agreement form to the right should done for the regional government meets the fundamental law on access to information.
LAW 27/2006 OF 18 JULY, BY REGULATING THE RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS (transposing the Directives 2003/4/EC and 2003/35 / EC),
To go to the OMBUDSMAN, which works for legal aid, you can do from the link:
You could also go to legal aid to the Human Rights Commission of the UN on this issue:
Complaint Procedure for the Council of the UN human rights, more information in the link:
"Given the manifest breach of the obligations in this area is the Government of the Principality, which has openly violated the commitments acquired by Spain known as the Aarhus Convention on 25 July 1998, ratified by His Majesty the King on 15 December 2004, and ignores the legal force of its transposition into Spanish law by Law 27/2006 of 18 July, which regulates the rights of access to information, public participation and access to justice in environment "links:
You can also complain to courts of justice in Spain.
Now he is a clear administrative process more than two years ago and that was and still is done behind the Asturian and Spanish citizenship and, indeed, I am now asking those who do nothing: also are making the necessary arrangements to seek the records of the Energy Strategy 2007-2012 and are making claims or complaints to those agencies listed above, where you can enjoy Legal Aid?